// Fios — from the Gaelic: knowledge

Tools that make
the invisible
visible.

Fios builds analytical instruments that expose the hidden mechanics of information systems. Free to use. Built for public understanding.

// Project 001 — Active

FLAK

A real-time media analysis installation. FLAK ingests live UK news feeds, scores headlines for fourteen categories of rhetorical manipulation, and renders the results as a five-minute dramaturgical cycle across four projected screens. The system operates like a living analytical organism — escalating, flooding, collapsing, resetting.

ClearScore < 40
AlertScore 40–79
CriticalScore ≥ 80
Explore the project →
// Project 002 — In Development

ACTA

A public record of UK political life. Voting records, declared interests, accepted donations, post-office appointments, business interests — one place, one timeline, no conclusions drawn. The record speaks for itself.

View upcoming projects →
Fios | Project 001

FLAK

A real-time media analysis installation examining how language circulates through contemporary news systems.

FLAK ingests live RSS feeds from 38 UK news outlets — tabloids, broadsheets, broadcasters, regional and devolved press — and scores every headline against a fourteen-rule analytical engine. The results drive a five-minute dramaturgical cycle across four Raspberry Pi nodes rendering visualisations on four projected screens.

FLAK is not a fact-checker. It does not verify the truth of claims. It is a pattern detection system — identifying rhetorical strategies that have been documented in peer-reviewed academic literature and regulatory frameworks as indicators of manipulative or misleading media language.

System states

Every headline receives a score. The score determines the system state. The state drives the visual output across all four screens simultaneously.

ClearScore below 40 — no significant rhetorical signal detected
AlertScore 40–79 — moderate rhetorical manipulation detected
CriticalScore ≥ 80 — serious rhetorical manipulation detected

The installation

The system runs on four Raspberry Pi computers connected over a local Ethernet network. Pi 1 is the engine — ingesting feeds, scoring headlines, broadcasting events. Pi 2, 3, and 4 are display nodes — each rendering a different layer of the system. A fifth component, an IBM PS/2 Model P70 running QBasic on DOS 6.22, processes a 100-document corpus of UK newspaper headlines from 1988–1993 through the same fourteen rules on a parallel cycle.

Screen A

Live article scanning — the input layer

Screen B

Language diagnostics — the analytical core

Screen C

Archive memory — the memory layer

Screen 0

Engine telemetry — system state

[ Installation photographs — to be added ] London Metropolitan University — May 2026

The dramaturgical cycle

FLAK operates in repeating five-minute cycles. Each cycle follows a structured dramatic arc — escalating from calm observation through alert and critical states before a three-second blackout and collapse into flood, then silence and reset.

Phase 1
0–60s
Phase 2
60–150s
Phase 3
150–228s
BLK
Flood
240–300s
Reset

The fourteen rules

Each rule detects a specific category of rhetorical manipulation. Rules are grounded in academic critical discourse analysis and mapped to specific IPSO and Ofcom regulatory clauses. Scores accumulate additively — a single headline can trigger multiple rules.

Dehumanising — weight 30

Mass movement, animal or disaster metaphors applied to people in migration contexts.

Fear mongering — weight 22

Inflation of systemic threat or collapse without evidential basis.

Scapegoating — weight 28

Attribution of systemic problems to a vulnerable outgroup.

Protest demonisation — weight 22

Framing of legitimate political dissent as criminality or threat to public order.

Sanitising violence — weight 25

Military euphemism obscuring the human cost of state violence.

False equivalence — weight 30

Presenting unequal situations as morally identical to provoke grievance.

Dog whistle — weight 30

Coded language activating racial or identity prejudice with plausible deniability.

Loaded language — weight 15

Evaluative judgement injected into reporting through loaded adjectives.

Moral panic — weight 18

Sweeping social decline narratives and folk devil construction.

Emotional intensifier — weight 25

Emotionally charged adjectives paired directly with outgroup nouns.

Anonymous alarming claim — weight 20

Anonymous sourcing combined with alarming claims to evade accountability.

Passive agency obscured — weight 15

Passive constructions deleting the agent of harm in contexts of state violence.

Selective statistics — weight 20

Decontextualised statistics used to alarm without informing.

Coordinated narrative — weight 25

Phrases signalling participation in coordinated editorial campaigns.

Score an article using these rules →    Read the full system defence →
Fios | FLAK — Article Scorer

Score an article

Paste a headline or article text below. The FLAK engine will score it against all fourteen rhetorical rules and return a breakdown of what was detected and why.

This is a public demonstration of the FLAK analytical engine. It uses the same rules as the installation but operates on text you provide rather than live news feeds. A full analysis application — FLAK v2 — is in development.

Analysis result

Fios | FLAK — The Essay
// In preparation

Pandemic of the Real

Language, Power, and the Hollowing of Meaning

In progress

A virus cannot survive alone. It enters a host, hijacks its machinery, compels reproduction of the intruder's code. Language works the same way. Words replicate through mouths, headlines, screens, algorithms — mutating as they travel, entering us, shaping us. By the time language becomes visible, it has already passed through us.

This essay examines how that contagion operates. How neoliberalism creates the conditions for it to spread. How simulation makes it invisible. And why a diagnostic instrument — silent, relentless, analytically alert — might be a more honest response than counter-speech.

The full essay is in preparation.

Fios | FLAK — System Defence Document v1.0
// Part One

What FLAK is
and what it does

1.1 — Project overview

FLAK is a real-time media analysis installation. It ingests live news feeds from major UK press outlets, analyses the rhetorical content of headlines using a rule-based scoring system, and distributes the results across a network of projected screens. The system operates in repeating five-minute dramaturgical cycles that escalate from calm observation through to an overwhelming critical state before collapsing into silence and resetting.

FLAK is simultaneously an artwork and a critical instrument. It exposes the invisible emotional mechanics of media language — the rhetorical devices, coded phrases, and framing strategies that shape public perception without declaring themselves as opinion.

The installation does not tell the audience what to think. It makes visible what is already happening in the language environment around them.

1.2 — What the system is not

FLAK is not a fact-checking system. It does not verify the truth or falsity of individual claims.

FLAK is not a content moderation system. It does not remove or suppress content.

FLAK is not a legal instrument. It does not make findings of regulatory breach.

FLAK is a pattern detection system operating in an arts context. It identifies rhetorical patterns that have been documented in peer-reviewed academic literature and regulatory frameworks as indicators of manipulative, misleading, or harmful media language. It presents these detections as material for critical reflection, not as verdicts.

1.3 — The installation context

FLAK operates as protected artistic expression. Critical commentary on media language — including commentary that identifies and names specific rhetorical strategies — falls within the tradition of media criticism, press freedom scholarship, and artistic practice. The installation is not making legal claims against any outlet. It is performing a critical analytical function that is explicitly supported by the academic and regulatory literature it draws upon.

The rules do not need to be legally airtight. They need to be dramatically and intellectually honest. This distinction is maintained throughout the system design and is explicitly acknowledged in the documentation.

// Part Two

The scoring system

2.1 — How scoring works

Each headline ingested by the system is passed through fourteen analytical rules. Each rule contains a set of regular expression patterns that identify specific rhetorical constructions in the headline text. When a pattern matches, the rule fires. Each rule carries a weight reflecting the assessed severity of the rhetorical device it detects. Scores accumulate additively across multiple rules.

2.2 — Score thresholds and states

ClearScore below 40
AlertScore 40–79
CriticalScore ≥ 80

2.3 — Why these thresholds

The thresholds were calibrated against the weight distribution of the fourteen rules. The lightest rules — loaded language and passive agency obscured — carry a weight of 15. A single hit scores 15, falling within CLEAR. The heaviest rules — dehumanising, false equivalence, dog whistle — carry weights of 30. Two hits from heavy rules score 60, entering ALERT. Three score 90, entering CRITICAL. This calibration means CLEAR is genuinely neutral, ALERT represents real concern, and CRITICAL represents multiple simultaneous rhetorical manipulations in a single headline.

2.4 — The dramaturgy override

During the flood phase — the final sixty seconds of each five-minute cycle — all headlines are rendered as CRITICAL regardless of their actual score. This is an artistic decision, not an analytical one. The flood phase represents the system reaching saturation — the cumulative effect of the media language environment. The dramaturgy override is not a claim that every flood-phase headline is critically manipulative. It is a representation of cumulative effect. The scoring system makes analytical claims. The dramaturgy makes artistic claims. They are separable.

// Part Three

The fourteen rules

3.1 — Rule design principles

Each rule was designed according to four principles: contextual requirement over single-word trigger; phrase-level detection over word-level detection; regulatory grounding in specific IPSO or Ofcom clauses; and academic grounding in named authors and documented frameworks. Weights reflect severity as assessed against the regulatory and academic literature, not personal editorial judgement.

3.2 — Rule-by-rule explanation

Rule 1 — DehumanisingWeight: 30

The application of mass movement, animal, or disaster metaphors to people in migration or demographic contexts. Words like flood, swarm, invasion, horde, plague applied to migrants, asylum seekers, or refugees.

Regulatory: IPSO Editors' Code Clause 12(i). Ofcom Broadcasting Code Section 2.3.
Academic: van Dijk, Racism and the Press (1991). Santa Ana, Brown Tide Rising (2002). UNHCR/IOM, Words Matter (2015).
Rule 2 — Fear mongeringWeight: 22

Inflation of systemic threat or collapse without evidential basis. Phrases that frame social, political, or demographic situations as catastrophic or at breaking point.

Regulatory: Ofcom Broadcasting Code Sections 2.1, 2.2, 5.1. IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(iii).
Academic: Entman, Framing (1993). Cohen, Folk Devils and Moral Panics (1972).
Rule 3 — ScapegoatingWeight: 28

Attribution of systemic social or economic problems to a vulnerable outgroup. Framing migrants, asylum seekers, or marginalised groups as an economic burden or drain on resources.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 12(i) and 1(i). Ofcom Sections 2.3 and 5.1. IMPRESS Standard 3.
Academic: van Dijk, Elite Discourse and Racism (1993). Hall, Policing the Crisis (1978).
Rule 4 — Protest demonisationWeight: 22

Framing of legitimate political dissent as criminality, irrationality, or threat to public order. Substituting mob, thugs, or anarchists for protesters.

Regulatory: Ofcom Sections 5.4, 5.5, 2.3. IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(iv). HRA 1998 Articles 10 and 11.
Academic: Hall, Policing the Crisis (1978). Fairclough, Media Discourse (1995).
Rule 5 — Sanitising violenceWeight: 25

Military euphemism and passive grammatical construction obscuring the human cost of state violence. Collateral damage, precision strike, neutralised.

Regulatory: Ofcom Sections 2.2, 5.1, 5.3. IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(ii).
Academic: Fairclough, Language and Power (1989). Glasgow Media Group, Bad News from Israel (2004). Knightley, The First Casualty (1975).
Rule 6 — False equivalenceWeight: 30

Rhetorical construction of grievance by presenting unequal situations as morally identical. One rule for them framing used to delegitimise policy or legal principle.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(iii). Ofcom Sections 5.4 and 5.12.
Academic: Lakoff, Don't Think of an Elephant (2004). Entman, Framing (1993).
Rule 7 — Dog whistleWeight: 30

Coded language that activates racial, cultural, or identity prejudice while maintaining plausible deniability. Phrases legible to a target audience but superficially neutral to others.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 12(i) and 12(ii). Ofcom Sections 2.3 and 3.1. Equality Act 2010 Section 4.
Academic: van Dijk, Racism and the Press (1991). Hall, Encoding and Decoding (1980).
Rule 8 — Loaded languageWeight: 15

Evaluative judgement injected into reporting through loaded adjectives, amplification verbs, or sensationalism markers that collapse the distinction between fact and comment.

Regulatory: IPSO Accuracy Clauses 1(i), 1(iii), 1(iv). NUJ Code Clauses 1 and 3.
Academic: Fairclough, Language and Power (1989). Glasgow Media Group, Bad News (1976).
Rule 9 — Moral panicWeight: 18

Sweeping social decline narratives and folk devil construction. Framing social change as national collapse, moral decay, or civilisational threat.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 1(i), 1(iii), 12(i). Ofcom Sections 2.1 and 5.1.
Academic: Cohen, Folk Devils and Moral Panics (1972). Hall, Policing the Crisis (1978). McRobbie and Thornton (1995).
Rule 10 — Emotional intensifierWeight: 25

Emotionally charged adjectives paired directly with outgroup nouns to prime negative affect. Dangerous migrants, predatory gangs, terrorist sympathisers.

Regulatory: IPSO Clause 12(i). Ofcom Sections 2.3 and 3.1. Equality Act 2010 Section 4.
Academic: van Dijk, Elite Discourse and Racism (1993). Sperber, Explaining Culture (2002). Boyer, Religion Explained (2002).
Rule 11 — Anonymous alarming claimWeight: 20

Anonymous sourcing combined with alarming claims. Sources say, insiders warn, it is feared — constructions that allow alarming assertions without attribution or accountability.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 1(i), 1(ii), 1(iii). NUJ Code Clauses 3 and 6.
Academic: Davies, Flat Earth News (2008). Full Fact methodology.
Rule 12 — Passive agency obscuredWeight: 15

Passive constructions deleting the agent of harm in contexts of state or institutional violence. Civilians were killed rather than forces killed civilians.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(ii). Ofcom Sections 5.1 and 5.3.
Academic: Fairclough, Language and Power (1989). Glasgow Media Group, Bad News (1976). van Dijk, News as Discourse (1988).
Rule 13 — Selective statisticsWeight: 20

Decontextualised statistics used to alarm without informing. Raw numbers attributed to outgroups without base rates, denominators, or comparative context.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(iii). Ofcom Sections 5.1 and 5.7.
Academic: Huff, How to Lie with Statistics (1954). Goldacre, Bad Science (2008). Full Fact methodology.
Rule 14 — Coordinated narrativeWeight: 25

Phrases signalling participation in a coordinated editorial campaign — two-tier policing, asylum hotels, activist judges, stop the boats, lefty lawyers.

Regulatory: IPSO Clauses 1(i) and 1(iii). Ofcom Section 5.4. Ofcom plurality framework.
Academic: Loughborough CRCC, EU Referendum Coverage (2016). Media Reform Coalition, Who Owns the UK Media? (2021). Hall, Encoding and Decoding (1980).
// Part Four

Known limitations

The system produces false positives. Some headlines will be flagged that do not contain genuine rhetorical manipulation. This is acknowledged, documented, and accepted as an inherent feature of pattern-based text analysis operating at speed on live data.

The system misses genuine rhetorical manipulation. Sophisticated framing that does not use the specific vocabulary or constructions the rules target will pass through as CLEAR.

The system analyses individual headlines in isolation. It cannot detect rhetorical manipulation that only becomes visible through comparison — asymmetric framing of the same event across outlets, or coordinated repetition across a news cycle. This is a target for Version 2 development.

The system analyses headline and summary text only. It does not analyse full article bodies. This is an architectural decision driven by performance requirements for the installation context.

// Part Five

Artistic intent and critical context

FLAK is designed as both an artwork and a critical instrument. As an artwork, it creates an immersive experience of the media language environment — the five-minute cycle is a representation of the cumulative emotional pressure exerted by contemporary news media. As a critical instrument, it makes visible the rhetorical strategies that normally operate below conscious attention.

The fourteen rules are a form of critical commentary on UK press practice. This commentary is protected as artistic expression. The installation is not making legal findings. It is performing the analytical work that media critics, press scholars, and regulatory bodies have documented as necessary.

The limitations documented in Part Four are evidence of intellectual honesty, not weakness. FLAK claims something modest and defensible — that it detects specific documented rhetorical patterns with reasonable reliability, acknowledges what it misses, and operates as a contribution to a continuing critical conversation rather than a final verdict.

FLAK System Defence Document v1.0 — 18 March 2026
Fios | FLAK — Bibliography

Bibliography

Barthes, Roland, Annette Lavers, and Roland Barthes, Mythologies (Hill and Wang, 2006).

Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulation, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2019).

Bernays, Edward L., and Mark Crispin Miller, Propaganda (Ig Publications, 2005).

Boyer, Pascal, Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors (London: Vintage, 2002).

Brown, Wendy, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution (Zone Books, 2015).

Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford University Press, 2020).

Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (Vintage, 1994).

Klein, Naomi, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (Toronto: Knopf Canada, 2007).

Lakoff, George, Howard Dean, and Don Hazen, Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives (Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004).

Lasswell, Harold D., Propaganda Technique in the World War (Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Ltd., New York, 1927).

Noble, Safiya Umoja, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (New York: New York University Press, 2018).

Severi, Carlo, The Chimera Principle: An Anthropology of Memory and Imagination, trans. Janet Lloyd (Chicago: Hau Books, 2015).

Sperber, Dan, Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach (Blackwell, 2002).

Steyerl, Hito, The Wretched of the Screen (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2012).

// A note on this section
The following works are cited in the FLAK system defence in support of the fourteen analytical rules. They constitute an active reading list being engaged with as the research continues. They are listed here in the interest of intellectual honesty — they ground the rule design but have not yet been read in full by the author.

Cohen, Stanley, Folk Devils and Moral Panics (London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1972).

Davies, Nick, Flat Earth News (London: Chatto and Windus, 2008).

Entman, Robert M., 'Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm', Journal of Communication, 43.4 (1993), pp. 51–58.

Fairclough, Norman, Language and Power (London: Longman, 1989).

Fairclough, Norman, Media Discourse (London: Edward Arnold, 1995).

Glasgow Media Group, Bad News (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976).

Glasgow Media Group, Bad News from Israel (London: Pluto Press, 2004).

Goldacre, Ben, Bad Science (London: Fourth Estate, 2008).

Hall, Stuart, and others, Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order (London: Macmillan, 1978).

Hall, Stuart, 'Encoding/Decoding', in Culture, Media, Language, ed. by Stuart Hall and others (London: Hutchinson, 1980), pp. 128–38.

Huff, Darrell, How to Lie with Statistics (New York: W. W. Norton, 1954).

Knightley, Phillip, The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero and Myth-Maker from the Crimea to Kosovo (London: Prion, 2000).

Loughborough Centre for Research in Communication and Culture, UK Press Coverage of the EU Referendum (2016).

McRobbie, Angela, and Sarah Thornton, 'Rethinking Moral Panic for Multi-Mediated Social Worlds', British Journal of Sociology, 46.4 (1995), pp. 559–74.

Media Reform Coalition, Who Owns the UK Media? (2021).

Santa Ana, Otto, Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002).

UNHCR/IOM, Words Matter: Glossary on Migration (Geneva: IOM, 2015).

van Dijk, Teun A., News as Discourse (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988).

van Dijk, Teun A., Racism and the Press (London: Routledge, 1991).

van Dijk, Teun A., Elite Discourse and Racism (London: Sage, 1993).

Independent Press Standards Organisation, Editors' Code of Practice (London: IPSO, 2021). Available at: ipso.co.uk.

IMPRESS: The Independent Monitor for the Press, The IMPRESS Standards Code (London: IMPRESS, 2021). Available at: impressorg.com.

National Union of Journalists, NUJ Code of Conduct (London: NUJ, 2011). Available at: nuj.org.uk.

Ofcom, Broadcasting Code, with specific reference to Section 2 (Harm and Offence), Section 3 (Crime), and Section 5 (Due Impartiality) (London: Ofcom, 2023). Available at: ofcom.org.uk.

Ofcom, Media Plurality Framework (London: Ofcom, 2022). Available at: ofcom.org.uk.

Full Fact, How We Fact Check. Available at: fullfact.org.

One hundred UK newspaper headlines from the period 1988–1993, scored against the FLAK fourteen-rule analytical engine. This corpus forms the source material processed by the IBM PS/2 Model P70 component of the installation.

All articles sourced via Newspapers.com (archive.newspapers.com). A seven-day free trial is available for visitors without institutional access.

43Clear
39Alert
18Critical
100Total
// Finding — Tabloid Absence

The Sun, Daily Mail, and Daily Mirror are absent from this corpus. Their archives are not accessible in digitised form through academic sources. This absence is itself a finding — the most rhetorically aggressive UK papers of the period are the least available to historical scrutiny. This connects to the Leveson Inquiry, the Hillsborough cover-up, and the Glasgow Media Group's documented pattern of commercial power protecting itself from academic analysis.

// Clear — Score 0
# Headline Source Date
01Whitby lifeboatmen get bravery medalsThe Press YorkMay 1989
02York fight may help save Rose TheatreThe Press YorkMay 1989
03Lithuania set to leave Soviet UnionThe IndependentMarch 1990
04Two Germanies start talks on unificationThe IndependentApril 1990
05Miners leaders vote for independent inquiryThe IndependentMarch 1990
06Bonn minister gloomy on prognosis for growthThe GuardianSeptember 1992
07Race to aid the giantsDaily TelegraphJuly 1989
08Hug an Aids child says Princess DianaEvening StandardApril 1991
09Walking tall — York man wins battle to save shattered hipThe Press York1989
10Steel City on a knife edgeThe GuardianDecember 1993
11Days of diplomatic disaster in PekingThe ObserverJanuary 1990
12General outlook — rain and showers across northern EnglandThe GuardianDecember 1993
13Air show thousands see Russian jets crash in skyThe ObserverJuly 1993
14Mandela the leader confounds the mythThe ObserverJuly 1990
15Mandela tells world of his ANC futureHerald ExpressFebruary 1990
16Power of silence proved by 27 years behind barsDaily TelegraphFebruary 1990
17Mandela free — pivot on which future of a country will turnThe GuardianFebruary 1990
18Assassins identity eludes Indian conspiracy theoristsThe IndependentMay 1991
19NUM officials in secret pit talksThe ObserverJuly 1993
20Belated bid by Peking to salvage its imageThe IndependentJune 1989
21Heroes of LA riots honouredEvening StandardMay 1992
22Moscow bids nostalgic farewell to ReaganThe IndependentJanuary 1989
23The making of President George BushThe GuardianJanuary 1989
24Reagan effect waning as Bush triumphsThe IndependentNovember 1988
25Arafat seeks PLO approval for dealThe IndependentSeptember 1993
26Sword of division hangs over holy cityThe IndependentSeptember 1993
27Israel acts to stem support for PLOThe GuardianNovember 1988
28A matter of existence for two peoplesThe GuardianOctober 1991
29Profit is tunnel projects prime objectiveThe IndependentAugust 1990
30IRA offered concessions for ceasefireDaily TelegraphDecember 1992
31A momentum all of its ownThe GuardianFebruary 1993
32A childs nightmare in SarajevoThe ObserverAugust 1993
33Anxious wait in Bay for relativesHerald ExpressApril 1989
34Bishop leads stunned city in mourningHerald ExpressApril 1989
35Maxwell pension victims to get Government aidDaily TelegraphJune 1992
36MPs demand guarantees on Maxwell aidThe IndependentJune 1992
37Burnage High School Inquiry — failure to heed the messagesManchester Evening NewsApril 1988
38What the Serbs really meanThe GuardianMay 1993
39Outcasts of Chernobyl — families who fled radiation face fear and prejudiceEvening StandardAugust 1993
40Chernobyl the final reckoningDaily TelegraphMay 1991
41Hardliners ignored as miners chase workThe ObserverJuly 1993
42Soviet anger over Vilnius trade talksThe GuardianJune 1990
43Deserters are determined to return homeThe IndependentOctober 1990
// Alert — Score 35–69
# Score Headline Source Date Rule
4435Sterling and shares suffer from poll tax riotThe IndependentApril 1990Fear Mongering
4535Yard pays 2 million poll tax riot billEvening StandardOctober 1990Fear Mongering
4635Northern Ireland peace process in jeopardyDaily TelegraphNovember 1993Fear Mongering
4735Army casualty toll worst since 1979The IndependentAugust 1988Fear Mongering
4835Street riots similar to warManchester Evening NewsSeptember 1991Fear Mongering
4935Estate in fear as crime soarsThe Press YorkFebruary 1993Fear Mongering
5035Old allies shiver as ice age politics returnThe IndependentAugust 1991Fear Mongering
5135Security forces take threats of more violence seriouslyThe IndependentSeptember 1990Fear Mongering
5235Nation in despair plea to GorbachevEvening StandardJuly 1989Fear Mongering
5335Iranian factions start public war of wordsThe IndependentMay 1991Fear Mongering
5435King jurors face hate mail threatsEvening StandardMay 1992Fear Mongering
5535New rampage in TorontoEvening StandardMay 1992Fear Mongering
5635Tragic failure to test Chernobyl effectsThe IndependentApril 1990Fear Mongering
5735Daly in talks with Sinn Fein to end IRA violenceDaily TelegraphJune 1992Fear Mongering
5840Protest or mob rule?The GuardianJanuary 1990Protest Demonisation
5940Dutch skinheads in the dock after poll tax riotDaily TelegraphOctober 1990Protest Demonisation
6040Rioters tumultuously assembledDaily TelegraphOctober 1990Protest Demonisation
6140Counter-revolution had to be crushedThe IndependentJune 1989Protest Demonisation
6240War of words over AidsThe GuardianDecember 1993Moral Panic
6340N Yorks child abuse cases soarThe Press YorkMarch 1988Moral Panic
6440The badly diseased logic at the heart of Aids-thinkDaily TelegraphSeptember 1992Moral Panic
6540Beijing reaps harvest of Cold War hostilityThe GuardianSeptember 1989Fear Mongering
6640Brutal echoes from Shanghais pastThe GuardianSeptember 1989Loaded Language
6740Police chief attacked for slow reaction to violenceDaily TelegraphMay 1992Loaded Language
6840Our loyalty is to the partyThe IndependentApril 1990Loaded Language
6940Journalists must cure themselves of this Aids madnessThe IndependentMarch 1993Moral Panic
7040Fury at police claims that fans robbed victimsEvening ChronicleApril 1989Loaded Language
7140Autocratic revolutionThe GuardianSeptember 1989Loaded Language
7250Increasing attacks on soldiers show new IRA strategyThe IndependentAugust 1988Terror
7350Ballygawley attack part of IRA drive for troops-out callThe IndependentAugust 1988Terror
7450IRA ability to strike at heart of British EstablishmentThe IndependentSeptember 1990Terror
7550Loyalists ready to strike back over Sinn Fein betrayalDaily TelegraphNovember 1993Terror
7650Northern Ireland: 20 years of undeclared warThe IndependentOctober 1988Terror
7750The men of war promise third violent decadeThe IndependentSeptember 1990Terror
7850Press urges punish the dog from BaghdadThe IndependentJanuary 1991Loaded Language
7950James was murdered before being hit by trainThe Press YorkFebruary 1993Loaded Language
8050Shadow of fear falls on white commuters of Cop CountyDaily TelegraphMay 1992Fear Mongering
8150Five suspected IRA terrorists appear before two courtsThe IndependentJuly 1989Terror
8240Mercy mission mired in the grave of good intentionsThe ObserverAugust 1993Loaded Language
// Critical — Score 70+
# Score Headline Source Date Rule
8370Western Europe is threatened with a flood of immigrantsDaily TelegraphOctober 1991Dehumanising
8470The flood of immigrants into Western EuropeThe GuardianDecember 1993Dehumanising
8570The main invasion has not yet arrived in this countryEvening StandardApril 1991Dehumanising
8670Germany law to curb flow of immigrantsDaily TelegraphMay 1993Dehumanising
8770Exodus: The new immigrant wave — a tide transforming IsraelDaily TelegraphOctober 1990Dehumanising
8870Israel fears gate may close for Soviet JewsThe IndependentAugust 1991Dehumanising
8970Eight police murdered in Algeria unrest by Islamic fundamentalistsDaily TelegraphFebruary 1992Dog Whistle
9075Army drops the mask and turns on its peopleThe IndependentJune 1989Sanitising Violence
9175Defensive action taken against Iraqi forcesThe IndependentFebruary 1991Sanitising Violence
9275Precision operation eliminates targetDaily TelegraphSeptember 1991Sanitising Violence
9375Collateral damage assessed after engagementThe IndependentFebruary 1991Sanitising Violence
9475Outfacing Saddam — threatening weapons of mass destructionDaily TelegraphSeptember 1991Sanitising Violence
9575Firing as Peking army firms gripThe Press YorkJune 1989Sanitising Violence
9675Foreign troops prop up Rwanda leaderThe IndependentOctober 1990Sanitising Violence
9780Attacks on Croatian towns shatter ceasefireThe IndependentSeptember 1991Fear Mongering
9880War in the Gulf — Israel keeps both sides guessingThe IndependentJanuary 1991Terror
9980Jordan under siegeThe IndependentJanuary 1991Fear Mongering
10080A common or garden coup says MajorThe IndependentAugust 1991Fear Mongering

All articles accessed via Newspapers.com. Full institutional access required. Free trial available at newspapers.com.

Fios | Upcoming

Upcoming

Fios instruments in development. Each project is a public tool first, an installation second.

// Project 002 — In Development

ACTA

From the Latin Acta Diurna — the daily public record ordered by Julius Caesar from 59 BC. Stone tablets posted publicly. The first institutionalised public record in the Western world. Acta means simply: things that have been done.

ACTA is a public-facing transparency platform aggregating existing public data about UK politicians into one clean, navigable place. Voting records. Declared interests. Accepted donations. Post-office appointments. Business interests held during office.

This information currently exists. It is scattered across inaccessible and poorly designed public sources. ACTA puts it in one place and makes the timeline readable.

ACTA makes no judgements. It draws no conclusions. It flags nothing as suspicious. It simply keeps the record legible. The connections are visible because the data is laid out in sequence — not because the system has interpreted anything.

Data sources: They Work For You API, Companies House API, Parliament structured data, Register of Members' Financial Interests, Lobbying Register. All code open source. Full methodology visible. All data points traceable to primary source.

Status: Concept complete. Development begins post-degree show, May 2026.

Further Fios instruments are in early conception. They will be announced here when they are ready to be demonstrated.

Fios | About

About Fios

Fios — from the Gaelic for knowledge — builds analytical instruments that expose the hidden mechanics of information systems.

These tools begin as public installations. Each installation is a proof of concept and a public demonstration — a way of showing the work in a physical space before it becomes a publicly accessible application. After FLAK, the sequence reverses: the application comes first, the installation follows as an event.

The work is not art about technology. It is technology used to do the work that critical analysis does — but at the speed and scale of contemporary information environments.

What Fios makes

Each project is an analytical instrument. The instrument is the product. The installation is the demonstration. The public application is the point.

The tools are built to be used. Not to be looked at. Not to sit behind glass. If you have found one of them useful, or if you have found one of them wrong, both of those responses matter.

Version 2

FLAK Version 2 is in development. It will move from pattern matching to semantic analysis, add asymmetric framing detection, cross-headline comparison, and coordinated narrative cluster detection. It will be a legally defensible public web application.

Future projects are in early development. They will be announced here when they are ready to be demonstrated.

Contact

For questions about the work, academic enquiries, or exhibition interest: fios.instruments@gmail.com